“YOU’RE FORGETTING WHO YOU ARE”; Rand Paul Makes Mincemeat Of George Stephanopolous

Sen. Rand Paul laid down some smack on ABC’s resident Democratic operative, George Stephanopoulos, on Sunday as he pushed back against another liberal media attempt to legitimize aspects of the 2020 election that very likely cost President Trump a second term.

And in doing so, the Kentucky Republican created a blueprint for other GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits not named Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse to use when disputing the false premise from Democrats and their media allies that during the last election cycle, ‘there is nothing to see here.’

The back and forth culminated with Paul shutting down Stephanopolous by saying: “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”

For his part, Stephanopoulos led with a false premise no one concerned about election integrity should ever accept: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”

No, Paul responded, he doesn’t accept that.

“Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

"*" indicates required fields

Will you vote for Trump in 2024?*
This poll subscribes you to our premium network of content. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.

“I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls.”

The Democratic operative jumped in: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”

See what he does here? Stephanopoulos expects Paul (and viewers) relies on flawed or incomplete processes in order to make his claim ‘there’s nothing to see here.’

Watch the full segment below:

Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.

The host went on: “The Department of Justice led by William Barr said there’s no widespread evidence of fraud. Can’t you just say the words, this election –”

But Paul broke in to say “no.”

“What I would suggest is that if we want greater confidence in our elections, and 75 percent of Republicans agree with me, is that we do need to look at election integrity, and we need to see if we can restore confidence in the elections,” said the Kentucky Republican.

Crosstalk ensued until Paul said: “Hey, George. George. George. Where you make a mistake is that people coming from the liberal side like you, you immediately say everything’s a lie instead of saying there are two sides to everything. Historically what would happen is if said that I thought that there was fraud, you would interview someone else who said there wasn’t. But now you insert yourself in the middle and say that the absolute … fact is that everything that I’m saying is a lie.

***Get FREE SHIPPING on all orders over $45 at our patriotic store!***

“Hold on a second,” the host responded, adding that the former president “said the election was stolen. This election was not stolen. The results were certified in every single state … after count and recounts.”

Again — incomplete premise. And Paul did not accept it.

“You’re saying that absolutely it was — you’re saying there was no fraud and it’s all been investigated, and that’s just not true.”

After more crosstalk and arguing about who was right, Paul said: “You say we’re all liars. You just simply say we’re all liars.”

“In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on them and no address. Historically those were thrown out, this time they weren’t. They made special accommodations because they said, oh, it’s a pandemic and people forgot what their address was.”

“So they changed the law after the fact. That is wrong, that’s unconstitutional. And I plan on spending the next two years going around state to state and fixing these problems and I won’t be cowed by liberals in the media who say, there’s no evidence here and you’re a liar if you talk about election fraud. No, let’s have an open debate. It’s a free country,” Paul said.

Stephanopoulos replied: “There is no widespread evidence of election fraud that overturned that results. That was stated as well by the Department of Justice led by President Trump’s attorney general. In Wisconsin, there were counts and recounts.”

“It was never studied. Even that’s not true. Even that’s not true. Even that’s not true,” Paul responded.

And he’s right.

“There’s been no examination, thorough examination of all the states to see what problems we had and see if they could fix them. Now, let me say to be clear, I voted to certify the state electors because I think it would be wrong for Congress to overturn that,” Paul tried to explain.

“But at the same time, I’m not willing just to sit here and say, oh, everybody on the Republican side is a liar and there is no fraud. No, there were lots of problems and there were secretaries of state who illegally changed the law and that needs to be fixed. And I’m going to work hard to fix it. And I won’t be cowed by people saying, oh, you’re a liar,” Paul said.

But Stephanopoulos, like a Democratic parrot echoing the talking point, said, “Sir, there are not — there are not two sides to this story. This has been looked in every single state.”

“Sure there are,” Paul said. “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side. You’re inserting yourself into the story to say I’m a liar because I want to look at election fraud and I want to look at secretaries of state who illegally changed the voter laws without the permission of their state legislatures. That is incontrovertible, it happened.”

“And you can’t just sweep it under the rug and say, ‘Oh, nothing to see here, and everybody is a liar and you’re a fool if you bring this up.’ You’re inserting yourself into the story. A journalist would hear both sides and there are two sides of a story,” he said.

***BRAND NEW Trump 2024 Hat Is Your FREE – Just Cover Shipping!***

“I believe in Pennsylvania, they broke the law, and I believe if that ever will get a real hearing in the Supreme Court, it was denied for standing. It wasn’t actually taken up. If it were taken up, I do believe that the Supreme Court would overrule and say that they did break the law illegally,” said Paul.

But alas, not a single word of truth Paul spoke registered with ABC’s Democratic operative.

“I asked you a very simple question, was the election stolen or not?” Stephanopoulos said at the end of the fiery exchange.

“I think there was a great deal of evidence of fraud and changing of the election laws illegally. And I think a thorough investigation is warranted,” Paul said

Notice: This article may contain commentary that reflects the author's opinion.