CNN Sends Trump Campaign Cease and Desist Letter, Trump Campaign Fires Back

Far-left network CNN sent out a cease and desist letter to the Trump campaign after the campaign released an ad showing CNN praise the government’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. CNN however is claiming that the ad is “deceptive” because they say the ad makes it seem that the network is agreeing that President Trump saved lives.

“A lawyer for CNN’s parent company WarnerMedia has written a cease-and-desist letter to President Trump’s re-election campaign over the misleading contents of a new campaign ad,” CNN announced Monday. “WarnerMedia says the Trump ad is misusing CNN news coverage in a way that’s ‘false, misleading and deceptive.’”

***Help Us TAKE DOWN The Liberal Media With Our TRUMP News Mobile App!***

“My administration will take all necessary steps to safeguard our citizens from this threat,” President Trump said at the beginning of the ad.

Check out what the Daily Wire reported:

"*" indicates required fields

Would you rather........*
This poll subscribes you to our premium network of content. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The ad then cuts to various critics of Trump’s initial ban on travel from China, including presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, who accuses Trump of “xenophobia.”

That criticism is followed by a clip from CNN’s Wolf Blitzer and Dr. Sanjay Gupta discussing the social distancing steps recommended by the federal government and taken by the states.

“Is it accurate that if these steps had not been put in place, … it could have been 2 million people down here in the United States?” asks Blitzer, while images of an airport screen showing “cancelled” flights and a Chinese airliner flash on the screen. “Yes,” says Gupta.

WATCH the clip below:

Radical opinion commentator for CNN Brian Stelter says that the clip is “misleading” because it suggests that Blitzer and Gupta are referring to the President’s Chinese travel ban.

***Get your Patriotic face masks with FREE SHIPPING today***

Stelter said:

The ad takes a segment from CNN’s “The Situation Room” out of context. On March 30, anchor Wolf Blitzer asked Dr. Sanjay Gupta, “Well, is it accurate that if these steps had not been put in place, the stay at home orders, the social distancing orders, as the President said yesterday, it could have been 2 million people down here in the United States?”

Gupta responded, “I mean, you know, these are all models, Wolf. It’s a little tough to say, but, you know, if you talk about something that is spreading, you know, very robustly throughout a community. You know, two to three times more contagious than flu, and up to 10 times, perhaps even more than that, more deadly than flu, then yes.”

Blitzer’s question was about “stay at home orders” and social distancing, but in the campaign ad, that portion of his question was omitted. After Blitzer and Gupta are shown on screen, the ad cuts to taped video that invokes Trump’s restrictions on travel from China, like an airport screen showing cancelled flights.

The ad “purposely and deceptively edits the clip to imply that Mr. Blitzer and Dr. Gupta were crediting the President’s travel ban policy issued in January for saving millions of American lives, when in fact Mr. Blitzer and Dr. Gupta were discussing recently implemented social distancing guidelines and stay-at-home orders issued by state and local governments,” said Rick McMurtry, the associate general counsel for WarnerMedia. “CNN hereby demands that you discontinue airing the advertisement with the CNN clip that has been distorted in such a way as to mislead the public.”

Murtaugh shot back at CNN, saying that for “once again” they are finding a reason to block a Trump campaign ad. The network “has now rejected multiple Trump ads that are demonstrably accurate,” Murtaugh added.

***Help Us TAKE DOWN The Liberal Media With Our TRUMP News Mobile App!***

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.

Notice: This article may contain commentary that reflects the author's opinion.